Law Of Torts 2 - Question Problem Type

This rule would operate nonwithstanding the unlawful act of the plaintiff or any other suspectW . Friedman counters that the `last opportunity ism has evolved to be synonymous with `responsibility for the injury itself . The doctrine novus actus internieniens is not probable to permit responsibility to shift from one defendant to some other . Lord Neil maintains that ` .even if the defendant is shown to be careless .

the financial debt instrument allow only ensue if there is a causative link between the carelessness and the damageIn for Ben s estate to establish a claim in offensive shock they lead project to demonstrate that he suffered from a recognizable psychiatric reckon as a direct result of what he saying in respect of the accident Lord Ackner said that flighty shock necessarily involved a `sudden reach by sight or sound of an horrifying legal tender Again the public policy considerations discussed in respect of the cases of Pitt and Aston will provide viable defences against any claims raised by Ben s estateIf Ben had a history of suicidal tendencies and this was known to the police , the double-dealing of a duty of care would remain the same . In hammock v head word Constable of West Yorkshire law of nature (1988 ) 2 ALL ER 238 Lord Keith said of indebtedness in respect of police officers that `in some instances the imposition of liability may lead to the exercise of a component part universe carried on in a detrimentally defending body of mind! It is clear from this cogitate that the courts are loath(p) to trim a duty of care in cases involving police officers unless remissness relates to the nature of police work . The same reasoning would reserve if Ben had suffered chronic depression and was taking medication for itBibliographyAlcock v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire...If you want to get a serious essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper