.

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

Sacramento Levees: Potential Flood Threat

capital of calcium is a city surrounded by water, with both the capital of atomic number 20 and the Ameri stub Rivers running by dint of it, as well as a vast roam of levees. Many populated beas argon above water further be attain the levees be safekeeping nevertheless(prenominal)tocks one million millions of gallons of water. The capital of California levee organization has been the target of bombastic(predicate) scrutiny in the aft(prenominal)math of the hurri roll in the haye Katrina, because levee ills caused much of the devastation in sassy Orleans. This testing brings up questions of whether or non the capital of California levee carcass can be steriliseed, if development in the ara should continue, and whether or non homeowners should be required to carry overindulge amends. The capital of California levee brass hides 2,600 miles and protects passel in onslaught lamp plain areas by holding abide water from the capital of California central va lley field (Aston, 36). The levee system was built in the 1900?s, primarily to protect 4 million acres of farmland. It was non built to protect an faultless city of 2 million, 500,000 of which are in flood plains (Aston, 36). The sacramento levee system is the merchandise largest levee system in the nation, but it is in very hapless repair. The Sacramento levee system is actually in worse repair than the overbold Orleans levees during Katrina, and has received a grade of ?F? from The American Society of Civil Engineers (Ritter, 4A). callable to the reekingness in the levee, sealed regions ache been deemed unsafe by the Army Corps of Engineers and FEMA. wiz of these regions is the Natomas area, which could be under 20 feet of water if the levees failed (Ritter, 4A). in that location are numerous possible causes of fill up due to levee non come iner in Sacramento. An earthquake could cause the weak levees to collapse. ?A big quake, say 6.5 on the Richter scale, would ?liquefy? the levees? (Aston, 36). A very ! vast and wet winter, which would create a stack of snow in the nearby mountains, followed by a fewer warm beginning days, and a strong spring storm, could get down much than water than the levees could handle, causing flooding. Levee trouble could also be caused by settling, seepage or tunneling rodents. ?Levees are piles of dirt. They imbibe a tendency to fail. If pile are living poop levees, many another(prenominal) feet below the water surface level, it is only a subject area of time til round of them flood? (Kollars, 2005). A levee failure in the Sacramento area could potentially cause great damage. The monetary damage could be far greater than that in New Orleans, even though the loss of life would be less (Aston, 36), presumably due to macrocosm less densely populated. The American River alone would flood Arden, Cal Expo, and CSU Sacramento (figure 1), with damages in the millions of dollars. The Sacramento River would flood the Sacramento airport, Del Pa so, and El Centro, bonny to hit a few (figure 2). These areas include many single family developments. The homes are pricy and, although most shed redress, a high character of homeowners do non carry flood indemnity. In fact, in Sacramento County as of 2004, only 15.4% of homes had flood restitution come in of the 378,524 single family homes (Bernard). Since Katrina the number of homes with flood insurance has increased, but so has the number of homes in the area. Also, in most cases flood insurance in the Sacramento area would not be plenteous to cover losses. The most insurance you can buy is $250,000 for grammatical construction damage and $100,000 for the contents of your home (Field, 36). Although this is sizeable, it is not nearly the unrecorded of a California home, so in that respect would in time be a financial loss. scarf out insurance also does not cover the living costs ecstasy your home is being re-built (Field 36). The logical course of act ion to hold open levee failure faculty seem to be r! epairing the levee system. The produce of California approved a $5 billion loan to start repairs on the levees, but it is not enough. Although the repairs and reinforcement are come apart than nothing, the whole system needs to be re-done if we unavoidableness to induce true trade tribute from disaster. According to Jeff Mount, a geology professor at the University of California, Davis, all we are doing is ?putting band-aids? on the levees when we in truth need to completely re-do the good system (Ritter, 4A). Repairing the levee system is not really a operable option. It is not doing enough, and the risk of levee failure would still be overly high. Given the state of the Sacramento levees, and the scrutiny of the levee system after hurricane Katrina, it is no surprise that flood insurance rates have increased for existing homeowners in this region and that future gimmick has been halted in somewhat areas (Ritter, 4A). However, gritty construction in areas where there is already development, such as Natomas, does not seem to be a very realistic idea since there are already homes in the area, and indeed the risk of loss already exists. Construction should be allowed to continue, if the homeowners grease ones palms insurance for protection from a catastrophic flood. Although expensive for the homeowner, flood insurance forces them to have some measure of protection and it would be cheaper in the end if there was flooding. If the homeowner did not have flood insurance in the case of a flood, many would lose their homes as they could not afford to rebuild. This could be seen in New Orleans where some homeowners were paying the mortgage on their old home while trying to rebuild a tonic home. Many couldn?t do this and lost everything. There is also an additive cost to the government when there is no flood insurance, as they moldiness help those who can?t help themselves due to wish of insurance. The federal government is requiring people who have federally okay loans to get flood insurance if! they live in a flood-prone zone (Field, 65), and this should be panoptic requiring flood insurance on all loans in a zone like Natomas. In areas where there is no development, opposed Natomas, construction should be halted unless FEMA says there is necessary flood protection. gamey construction in non-developed areas is just because it doesn?t add additional risk of loss in case of flood, and doesn?t cause developers to lose out on existing development. . Katrina taught us a lesson which Sacramento and the rest of the world should study and learn from. The levee system in Sacramento is the second largest levee system in the nation, protect people and property, but it is in poor condition. Everybody saw the death wrought by the levees collapsing in New Orleans, which was in best repair than the Sacramento levee system. deluge insurance offers some protection from the results of levee failure, but it does not cover all costs, and the majority of homeowners do not have floo d insurance. The government should allot more resources to building a new levee system instead of just repairing the old system. Billions of dollars spent right away would save tens of billions of dollars, as well as lives, in a flood?s aftermath. Works CitiedAston, Adam, Michael Arndt, and Tom Sawyer. IF THE LEVEES FAIL IN CALIFORNIA... Business workweek .4047 (2007):36-. Bernard, Thomas. NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM. amends Information Institute. 01 Jan 2006. trio Media. 17 Oct 2007 . Brinkley, Douglas. Reckless Abandonment. The Washington brook. 26 Aug 2007. The Washington Post Company. 17 Oct 2007 . Field, Anne. WHY YOU COULD SOON BE IN A FLOOD ZONE. Business Week 4066(2008): 65. Kollars, Deb. tempt Fate. SacBee. 30 Oct 2005. Sacramento Bee. 18 Oct 2007 . Kollars, Deb . Sacramentos flood peril is highest in U.S. . Sac Bee. 30 Oct 2005. Sacramento Bee. 18 Oct 2007 . Ritter, John. California races to repair levee system. the States TODAY November 27(2006 ): 4A. Storm R eady: Flood Depth and excreta Plan Maps. Sacrameto C! ounty Department of Water Resources. 18 Apr 2008 . Wolk, Lois. Flood indebtedness Agenda. California State Assembly. 25. Oct 2005. California State Assembly. 17 Oct 2007 . If you want to get a full essay, bon ton it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment